In recent months,The Shack has stormed bookstores across the nation, climbing its way to the top of the bestseller list under the genre of “Christian fiction.” Admittedly, I had no interest in reading the book simply due to the fact that I usually prefer non-fiction titles. But after weeks of hearing and seeing people read, tote, talk about, recommend, and even distribute this book to others en masse, I finally relented and bought a copy just to see what all the fuss was about. Even as I write this sentence The Shack ranks #6 on Amazon.com’s overall best-seller list, where it boasts more than 520 reader reviews. What’s the appeal? And is it really that good? Let’s take a look…
THE SHACK
(William P. Young, Newbury Park, CA: Windblown Media, ©2007, 256 pp., List price: $14.99)
Reviewed by Dr. Scott E. Kaufman, Director of Healthcare Ministries
Author. William P. Young was born in Canada and raised among a stone-age tribe by his missionary parents in Papua, New Guinea. He now resides in Gresham, Oregon. Young writes, “The Shack was a story written for my six children, with no thought or intention to publish. It is as much a surprise to me as to anyone else that I am now an ‘author.’”
Synopsis. The Shack is a fictional story that seeks to provide answers to the age-old question, “Where is God in a world so filled with unspeakable pain?” Mack, the main character, has lived under the burden of The Great Sadness since the abduction and murder of his daughter four years previous. He then receives a note from God (“Papa”), inviting him to return to the shack — the scene of his daughter’s murder — for a time together. When he returns to the scene, Mack is treated to a weekend encounter with the Godhead. Each member of the Trinity is present: “Papa” – a large African-American woman (representing the Father); ”Sarayu” – an ethereal woman of Asian descent (representing the Holy Spirit); and “Jesus” – a Middle Eastern man with carpentry skills. Most of the book is Mack’s dialogue with these characters from this point on. They discuss many topics, but ultimately help Mack to deal with The Great Sadness. By the time the weekend is over, Mack is a changed man.
Spiritual Intent & Theological Impact. Although a fictional work, Young did not write this book for the story. This book is all about the content and the teaching it contains. “The Shack — God As You’ve Never Seen Him Before!” says an ad on his website. The book is clearly intended to impact readers’ ideas about God, evil, and a host of other important theological topics. And it is succeeding. Readers are describing it as “life changing,” “spiritually profound,” “theologically enlightening” and “teaching powerful theological lessons.” One reviewer writes, “Our Bible study group is really enjoying doing a study on The Shack” (emphasis added). Many readers are claiming that the book has changed not only their lives, but also their understanding of God. But the reader should note that errorneous teachings abound in The Shack. Not only does it teach a false view of God and the Trinity, it also downplays the importance and uniqueness of the Bible, misrepresents redemption and salvation, teaches a false understanding of evil, muddies the concept of forgiveness, and more. But don’t just take my word for it. I would strongly recommend the following reviews by two very solid leaders in the evangelical world:

1) Tim Challies. One of the best reviews of The Shack I have found is the one by Tim Challies. He authors the website, Challies Dot Com, and is editor of Discerning Reader, a site dedicated to discerning reviews of books that are of interest to Christians. He is also the author of the book (reviewed on this site yesterday), The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment. You may download Challies’ review (pictured at right) in PDF format by clicking here.
2) Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr. Another excellent review of The Shack was recently done by Dr. Al Mohler, who serves as president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Recently, Dr. Mohler featured, “A Look at The Shack” on The Albert Mohler Radio Program, where he gave an extended analysis of the book and made note of its serious, even dangerous, theological deficiencies. Mohler states of The Shack:
♦ “This book includes undiluted heresy.”
♦ “This book simply, by any measure, falls far short of biblical Christianity.”
♦ “Regardless of intention (I can’t read the [author's] heart), I can tell you that the effect of the book is indeed deeply subversive of the Christian faith, and I think inherently seductive as well.”
You may listen to the full audio recording of “A Look at The Shack” on The Albert Mohler Radio Program here.
Who Should & Who Shouldn’t Read The Shack ? A reviewer on Amazon.com wryly notes:
The Shack IS recommended reading IF…
♦ You want to recreate God in your own image;
♦ You find Isaiah’s portrayal of a holy God seated upon His throne to be a disturbing image;
♦ You would prefer to metaphorically cast God the Father as a loving and large black woman named “Papa,” Jesus as a laid back and friendly Middle Eastern man, and the Holy Spirit as a calm and cool Asian woman;
♦ You want a God so small that you and she/he/she can just hang out together as best buddies;
♦ You regard the Bible as an extremely biased, narrow-minded, and insufficient revelation of God in leather binding with “guilt edges” (p. 65);
♦ You believe that God is never to be feared (p. 90);
♦ You believe that Jesus’ miracles do not affirm Him as God, but prove only “that Jesus is truly human” (p.99);
♦ You want a God who does not hold people accountable for, nor punishes sin (p. 119);
♦ You want a God who does not demand that you submit to him or her, but one who submits to YOU (p. 145);
♦ You want a God who accepts everyone — “Buddhists…Muslims, bankers and bookies” — as his or her children no matter what their beliefs or behavior, and that Jesus has “no desire to make them Christian” (p. 223);
♦ You believe that Jesus lied when He warned, “Broad is the road that leads to destruction” (Matthew 7:13), because in The Shack, Jesus says, “Most roads don’t lead anywhere.”
The Shack is NOT recommended for… any Christian who loves the Bible and wants to know God as He wants to be known — as He has revealed Himself to mankind in the Scriptures.
CONCLUSION. We will conclude with a final quote from Tim Challies: “Because of the sheer volume of error and because of the importance of the doctrines reinvented by the author, I would encourage Christians, and especially young Christians, to decline this invitation to meet with God in The Shack. It is not worth reading for the story and certainly not worth reading for the theology… That The Shack is a dangerous book should be obvious from this review. The book’s subversive undertones seek to dismantle many aspects of the faith and these are subsequently replaced with doctrine that is just plain wrong. Error abounds. I urge you, the reader, to exercise care in reading and distributing this book. The Shack may be an may be an engaging read but it is one that contains far too much error. Read it only with the utmost care and concern, critically evaluating the book against the unchanging standard of Scripture. Caveat lector!” A Latin phrase meaning,