In these significant days that God is permitting us to live, I believe it is appropriate for Southern Baptists to seriously study the possibility of changing our name. The recommendations that our convention adopted overwhelmingly in 2010 relating to the Great Commission Resurgence helped refocus us on our mission and re-establish our vision for the future.
The subsequent convention meeting in 2011 adopted with little to any debate at all, the recommendations that were necessary to implement organizationally what was needed to set the stage for us to move into this Great Commission Resurgence. These are unprecedented days in our convention’s history.
While serving as Chairman for one year of the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force, we did have a few recommendations presented to us about changing the name of our convention.
While we did discuss the possibility and felt the study needed to be done, we concluded that it was beyond our purview and would possibly sidetrack us from our number one assignment: To bring to the SBC meeting in 2010 recommendations for “how Southern Baptists can work more faithfully and effectively together in serving Christ through the Great Commission.” However, now is the right time for this name change study to occur.
I am going to discuss what I believe to be the critical issues the study committee needs to address. The question, “Should The Southern Baptist Convention Change Its Name?” can only be answered after giving serious thought to a couple of more important questions. What are those questions?
Question #1: Will a name change help us further our missional vision?
One of the recommendations we made to the convention in 2010 contained a newly defined missional vision. This recommendation was highly appreciated by most, if not all, of our messengers.
Therefore, we adopted the following statement to guide us from now on:
As a convention of churches, our missional vision is to present the Gospel of Jesus Christ to every person in the world and to make disciples of all the nations.
This missional vision needs to be lifted up highly in all we do as a convention. It needs to drive everything we do. It is the vision that will unite us.
Therefore, we have ask ourselves seriously, “Will a name change help us further our missional vision?” Unquestionably, each Christ-follower has to take this missional vision seriously and own it personally.
Yet, in the larger context of our convention we need to ask if a name change will help us further our missional vision in the work we do together as churches regarding the Great Commission. A serious study will answer this question.
Question #2: Will a name change bring clarity about who we are and what we are doing across the world?
This is also a very important question that has to be answered honestly and forthrightly. This convention is very complex and is in need of clarity. How can you bring clarity in a convention that is comprised of 45,000 plus churches, twelve SBC national entities, forty-two unique state conventions and 1,200 unique associations?
Without a strong missional vision that receives our upmost priority and a name that reflects who we are and the vision of who we want to become, clarity will be impossible to achieve.
Does our name “Southern Baptist Convention” represent properly who we are presently? Yes or no? You have to decide that personally, but this study committee has to answer this difficult question.
I believe any one of us that answers this question seriously and objectively has to admit that we are no longer just a “Southern” Baptist Convention regionally. We are all over America and the world. While our present name represents so many wonderful and great things in this world and has served our past well, is it the best name that represents who we are today and who we want to become in the future?
I think the only debate that will be on the table will be regarding the words, “Southern” and “Convention”. But mainly the word, “Southern”. Why? It is simple and stated already: we are no longer just a convention of churches that are located regionally.
As a Great Commission people, we are not backing up in history, but forging new paths penetrating and pushing back on the extreme lostness of our nation and world. This I know we can agree upon.
Whether it is in New York City or Los Angeles or Great Falls or Tallahassee or Birmingham or Austin, or even in Tokyo or Jerusalem or London or Mumbai or Beijing, it needs to be clear about who we are and what we are doing across the world.
Yes, a serious study about a name change is needed. This is another reason why I encourage pastors and church leaders to read Our Last Great Hope. It will reshape their conversations with a greater emphasis on the church’s missional vision. It will help the reader answer these questions personally as well as in their church.
Question #3: Will Southern Baptists support a name change?
Based off of what is perceived, perhaps some have already made up their minds. I plead with you, do not do that. God is able to move sovereignly through our convention processes and reveal to us His will.
In time, legalities probably can be overcome. Through due diligence by this study committee, a conclusion can be reached that is best for Southern Baptists. I, for one Southern Baptist, will support the decision of the study committee.
If they come back and tell us that we just cannot change our name at this time due to history, legalities, or whatever else, then it is fine with me. If they recommend a name change, then I will embrace their recommendation. My trust is not in people, but in the power of God that works within and through them.
While a small group of godly men and women have been selected to conduct this study, there are things each of us can be doing as well. In closing I appeal to you in these specific areas:
- Be optimistic: There is nothing wrong with a due diligence study. Let the process occur. Choose against negativity.
- Accept the task force: These people did not beg for this task, but were asked by our President to study it. There is no secret plan or plot by anyone. These are godly people who do not deserve anyone to question their motives.
- Support them: Encourage these men and women, as well as our President. Anyone can criticize or be cynical; however, we are not some secular organization full of secular people. We are His church filled with people that have trusted in the Lord Jesus alone for our salvation. Remember that we are His people filled with the Holy Spirit and should demonstrate the fruit of His Spirit at all times and in every situation.
- Understand the Issue: The issue being studied is over “name change,” not over whether we need revival or a new heart. All of us know our number one need is spiritual revival. However, if God grants this it will not negate the practical problems due to our name that will be encountered in various places outside of the South. The late Dr. Adrian Rogers, one of our great SBC leaders, used to say, “You cannot spiritualize management problems.” We need to remember this in life, ministry, and even in our convention deliberations.
- Trust the Lord: Pray for them and this process daily. It will be a grueling and gut-wrenching experience for them. They need to know we are behind them in prayer, trusting the Lord to use them to show us His will.
We can do all of these things. In this special moment of time, let’s stand up and be His people together. I am trusting in the Lord alone.
Yours for the Great Commission,
Ronnie Floyd
Author of newly released book, Our Last Great Hope